[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [OS:N:] K12 and Red Hat
- From: Todd Warner <taw redhat com>
- To: "jerryc innerpeace org" <jerryc innerpeace org>
- Cc: open-source-now-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [OS:N:] K12 and Red Hat
- Date: Thu Mar 6 20:48:20 2003
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, jerryc innerpeace org wrote:
> Thanks, Todd. I might try it again someday.
>
> The difference between a server and a desktop problem would be, for
> example, apache security updates, which I don't even use, since I do not
> use my computer as a server. I know there were some others, but it's
> been a while now since I just stopped dealing with it because it didn't
> seem responsive.
The reason I asked this was... if you are connected to the internet,
or others have access to your machine, security updates really do
matter, whether the computer is a server or desktop.
If you have a desktop machine and you have apache installed... yet are
not using it. Removed it! :)
RHN points out all kinds of crap I don't need to have installed. Emacs
for one. ;)
Heh... and if you use sendmail on your box. update now!!! :)
Regardless... if you have RHN issues, use the rhn-users list. And if you
pay... use the support routes. The mailing list is a great resource
though and we (everyone in RHN) all lurk on it.
> Todd Warner wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, jerryc innerpeace org wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I've had problems with it, too. It kept telling me about problems I
> >>didn't care about, server problems, but I only use my computer as a
> >
> >
> > What is the difference between a server and desktop problem?
> >
> >
> >>desktop. It also kept insisting on updating my kernel, but I use a
> >>winmodem driver that is very kernel specific and tends to lag behind the
> >
> >
> > Kernels are updated only if you specifically ask them to be. RHN will
> > keep telling you that they are out of date though, as it should.
> >
> >
> >>kernel updates. When I tried to opt out of those updates, it kept
> >>wanting to download them to me anyway. Finally, I just gave up.
> >
> >
> > If this is the case, someone changed your package exceptions
> > configuration. Any rpm that you want to exclude from the default update
> > process needs to be added to the "Package Exceptions".
> >
> > In Red Hat Linux 8.0 (at the commandline):
> > up2date --configure
> > type in your root password...
> > Click on the "Package Exceptions" tab
> > Type "kernel*" (no quotes) in the "Add new:" space.
> > Click "Add"
> >
> > You can exclude any package.
> > For example, I have the usual kernel*, but I also have my own person
> > version of xscreensaver running, so I exclude that as well...
> > xscreensaver*.
> >
> > When you run the GUI version of up2date, the first package selection
> > screen will be for any "excluded" packages. If you still don't want
> > them, just go to the main package selection screen by clicking Forward
> > (or Next... can't remember).
> >
> > For the commandline version: "up2date -u" will update all but the
> > excluded packages. "up2date -u -f" will update *all* of them, to include
> > the ones marked as excluded.
> >
> >
> > If you have any more RHN specific questions, please subscribe to the
> > rhn-users mailing list.
--
____________
/odd Warner <taw {redhat,pobox}.com>
Bit Twiddler - Operation Cheetah Flip - Red Hat Inc.
---------------------gpg info in the message headers--------------------
"It's not having what you want; it's wanting what you've got"
-Sheryl Crow
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]